Empathetic offense

What do I mean by the title? It's basically when one takes offense on behalf of another. The question is this, should one do that? I say that it depends. Getting offended is a choice, but it is  irrelevant unless acted upon. One should only practice this empathetic offense when it concerns somebody that is known 100% for hating what was said. Like if a kid in class was raped by his father and someone else starts talking to him about how stupid male rape victins are and he snaps. Stuff like that is ok, I guess. The problem is where the line should be drawn. There is no measure for these things. It is hard to know if the person you are practicing empathetic offense for even cares. At that point, you are just being self-righteous. And we've been over that. For this reason, I think it is best not to act on the empathetic offense even if it is taken unless the person in question does. Then you can jump in.
What about empathetic offense as it refers to a group of people? Well, I think the same approach should be taken.

In conclusion, empathetic offense is only valid if the person in question is shown to have been offended. If he or she has not, then you are just being self-righteous. So stop.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Incels are equal parts interesting and sad

Laziness

I wish I wasn't different